There seems to be a common misconception about Debian’s package manager “apt”, that the command “dist-upgrade” is used to upgrade to a new release. It is, but it isn’t. I wanted to clarify that here.
Basically, there are 4 things that you might want to do as part of upgrading a system.
apt-get update– updates the list of available packages and versions
apt-get upgrade– upgrade packages that you already have
apt-get dist-upgrade– upgrade packages that you already have, PLUS install any new dependencies that have come up
- edit the sources files – change the release that you are tracking
That means that to freshen up your packages to the latest versions on your current release, you should do “
apt-get update && apt-get dist-upgrade“. On some systems that track “testing”, which changes often, I do this almost daily.
When you’re ready to “really upgrade” to a new release, you edit your sources files in /etc/apt/sources and change the release names. If the source lists contain proper release names, like “etch”, “lenny”, “squeeze” or “wheezy”; then you change these names to the new release that you want (see http://www.debian.org/releases/). If the source lists contain symbolic names like “stable”, “testing” and “unstable”, you do not need to change anything. When a new release is ready, the Debian people will change the symbols to point to the new release names. For example, right now, stable=squeeze and testing=wheezy.
Note 1 – “unstable” never points to a named release… it’s the pre-release proving ground for packages, used before are ready for inclusion in the testing release.
Note 2 – Don’t let these symbolic names fool you:
- “Stable” means “old, tried, tested, and rock solid”. It’s a very conservative choice.
- “Testing” does not mean “chaotic”. It is roughly the equivalent of Red Hat’s Fedora. It’s new stuff, and each package changes on its own schedule, but they usually play well together.
- “Unstable” is not nearly as unstable as the name implies. It’s like a beta release that may be updated daily.
After your source lists look OK, you do the same thing you’ve always done: “
apt-get update && apt-get dist-upgrade“”
apt-get update && apt-get dist-upgrade“.
If you’re running Ubuntu, the release names are at http://releases.ubuntu.com/. And they’ve made a nice wrapper script called “do-release-upgrade” that basically edits your source lists and does the dist-upgrade for you (it also does some other nice steps, like letting you review the changes).
So there it is… fear not the “dist-upgrade”. In fact, most of the time, it is what you’ll want to run. It will make sure that you have all of the dependencies that you need.
This entry was posted by alan on April 26, 2012 at 9:21 am, and is filed under free software, tips & tricks. Follow any responses to this post through RSS 2.0. Both comments and pings are currently closed.
apt-get dist-upgradewill install new dependencies. But dist-upgrade is more willing to remove packages to resolve conflicts in places where plain upgrade would more likely just give up.
Also, Debian’s unstable does have a codename, but it never changes it’s always “sid”.